[SciPy-user] Least squares for sparse matrices?
Fri Nov 21 15:01:57 CST 2008
Thank you for the quick response. I spent some time thinking and
looking things up, and I think I understand your suggestions (with the
exception of preconditioning.) I can afford to do a sparse LU. But I
think that your suggestion does not provide a control equivalent to
the rcond argument to numpy.linalg.lstsq.
>>>>> "NB" == Nathan Bell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
NB> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Andy Fraser <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I am trying to understand the behavior of matrices that
>> approximate Radon transforms and their inverses. So far, I've
>> used commands like the following to experiment with various
>> values of SVDcond:
>> V_1,resids,rank,s =
>> Is there a sparse version of lstsq that will let me exploit the
>> sparseness of M_Radon?
>> It would be even better if there were something like a sparse
>> SVD that would let me pre-calculate an SVD decomposition and
>> then later use it to invert several U_0 vectors.
NB> I think the best we can currently offer you is an iterative solver
NB> (e.g. cg()) on the normal equations. Something like
NB> from scipy.sparse.linalg import LinearOperator, cg from
NB> scipy.sparse import csr_matrix
NB> M_Radon = csr_matrix(M_Radon) M,N = M_Radon.shape
NB> def matvec(x): return M_Radon.T * (M_Radon * x)
NB> A = LinearOperator( (N,N), matvec) x,info = cg(A, U_0)
NB> If you can afford to do a sparse LU decomposition of M_Radon,
NB> then you can either use that directly, or as a preconditioner
NB> to cg.
Andy Fraser ISR-2 (MS:B244)
firstname.lastname@example.org Los Alamos National Laboratory
505 665 9448 Los Alamos, NM 87545
More information about the SciPy-user