[SciPy-user] Ubuntu Libraries
Mon Oct 6 20:47:54 CDT 2008
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:47 PM, jah <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I was hoping someone could clarify the ubuntu packages and what is actually
> needed by scipy.
> 1) I keep seeing posts about g77 not being required anymore and gfortran
> preferred. What is the "official" statement? In INSTALL.txt, only g77 is
> mentioned for Ubuntu packages via: """Debian/Ubuntu packages (g77):
> atlas3-base atlas3-base-dev""". The only reference to gfortran is with Mac
> OS X. Also, in "Optional Packages" debian packages 'gcc g++ g77' are
Debian (and thus Ubuntu as well) has transitioned from g77 to
gfortran, so only gfortran is needed.
> 2) The install notes also say that a complete version of LAPACK is required
> for scipy. All the ubuntu descriptions say that only a subset of routines
> from LAPACK are included with ATLAS. For example,
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/libatlas-sse2-dev. Is this a problem?
As far as I know, you can use atlas instead interchangebly. You can
find some (fixed) Debian bug reports about that in the python-numpy
> 3) It looks like there are two packages: atlas3-sse2 and
> libatlas-sse2-dev. Are both required? It seems that they refer to
> different versions of ATLAS.
> On reading http://www.scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/Linux, it seems like I only
> should need libatlas-sse2-dev. Correct?
The easiest way to determine the build dependencies is to do:
$ apt-get source python-scipy
$ cd python-scipy-0.6.0/
$ cat debian/control
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Uploaders: Alexandre Fayolle <email@example.com>, Marco Presi
(Zufus) <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ondrej Certik <email@example.com>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 22.214.171.124), dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), quilt,
python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5), python-numpy (>= 1:1.0.2), gfortran,
sharutils, swig, libsuitesparse-dev (>= 3.1.0-3), libnetcdf-dev,
libx11-dev, libblas-dev | libatlas-base-dev, liblapack-dev | libatlas-base-dev,
And you can read the Build-Depends right away.
Btw, is there any reason why the official Debian/Ubuntu packages are
not sufficient for you? I.e. is it because you need the svn version of
scipy? I haven't checked out if the svn scipy builds using the same
build dependencies as 0.6.0, that's true.
More information about the SciPy-user