[SciPy-user] scipy.sparse.linalg.cg not thread safe?
Tue Jan 27 15:10:15 CST 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:11, Nathan Bell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Robert Kern <email@example.com> wrote:
>> It's probably not threadsafe.
> I don't know Fortran, so I can't say:
> Anway, here's a pure-SciPy CG implementation (also BSD-licensed):
> It should be a drop-in replacement for sparse.linalg.cg() and have
> comparable speed. The only dependency is to the norm() function in
> PyAMG, but you can swipe that easily too.
> In time we should replace all of the Fortran implementations of the
> iterative methods with pure-Python code. This would be a nice target
> for SciPy 0.8.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the SciPy-user