[SciPy-user] scipy.sparse.linalg.cg not thread safe?
Tue Jan 27 15:36:16 CST 2009
Sounds good. +1 :)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:11, Nathan Bell <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> It's probably not threadsafe.
> > I don't know Fortran, so I can't say:
> > Anway, here's a pure-SciPy CG implementation (also BSD-licensed):
> > http://code.google.com/p/pyamg/source/browse/trunk/pyamg/krylov/cg.py
> > It should be a drop-in replacement for sparse.linalg.cg() and have
> > comparable speed. The only dependency is to the norm() function in
> > PyAMG, but you can swipe that easily too.
> > In time we should replace all of the Fortran implementations of the
> > iterative methods with pure-Python code. This would be a nice target
> > for SciPy 0.8.
> Robert Kern
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
> -- Umberto Eco
> SciPy-user mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-user