[SciPy-user] OS-X Universal binary?
Thu Mar 26 16:06:10 CDT 2009
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 16:03, David Cournapeau <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 15:46, Zachary Pincus <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Chris Barker
>>>> <Chris.Barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
>>>>> OK -- it turns out that the Universal binary has more than just the
>>>>> Universal issue. The extensions depend on libgfortran, too
>>>> Hm, right - that by itself is expected. I guess we never thought about
>>>> it because every developer has gfortran. But surely, it cannot work as
>>>> we do currently.
>>>> That's actually a non trivial problem, unless libgfortran can easily
>>>> be statically linked. Hm...
>>> In the past, (I think) I've forced static linkage by hiding
>>> libgfortran.dylib and *just* having libgfortran.a where the linker can
>>> find it. (On OS X there's no other reliable way to force static
>>> linkage of anything, so much does the linker prefer dylibs!) This
>>> worked for me when I needed to distribute bits of scipy that I'd
>>> parted out for other purposes, and built as 2-way (32bit i386/PPC) fat
>>> binaries. But that was with a previous version of gfortran from the R
>>> tools site.
>> Actually, there is. Use -Wl,-search_paths_first to tell the linker to
>> look at your -L flags before the standard locations. From a snippet of
>> email I (apparently) have to trot out every few months or so
> When I tried something similar, I got the same errors as in the following email:
> There is not much documentation on this, but I wonder why gfortran
> would grow a --static-libgfortran if the result was exactly the same
> as linking statically libgfortran.a ? You never encounter problems
> when statically linking the fortran runtime ?
Not in any of the times I have tried it. However, there have been a
few point releases since then. Maybe they changed something that broke
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the SciPy-user