[SciPy-user] firwin upgrades
Stéfan van der Walt
Sat May 2 21:14:01 CDT 2009
2009/5/3 Tom K. <email@example.com>:
> That sounds good. I see now that it can be made backwards compatible - BUT
> I think we need to keep the signature static, so the new 'type' kwarg should
> be at the end, and the 'cutoff' should not change to 'freqs' (in case
> someone called with kwargs e.g. firwin(N=101, cutoff=.1)). Hence new
> signature would be:
> s.firwin(N, cutoff, width=None, window='hamming', type='pass')
> Does that sound about right?
Sounds good to me!
More information about the SciPy-user