Wed Dec 1 18:19:04 CST 2010
On 12/1/10 4:09 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
>> I frequently run software on
>> machines that only have NumPy installed.
> Seems like a strange discussion to have on the scipy list :)
True -- and yet I didn't have scipy on this machine yet, either...
> I don't want to have a hole in my unit test coverage. But I could copy
> over the nan functions in scipy stats. And I guess the benchmark could
> use those too. And then skip moving window benchmarks against
> scipy.ndimage for those who don't have scipy installed.
I'd vote to have unit tests that don't require scipy, but I think it's
fine that the benchmarks do -- that's kind of the point of them --
comparing bottleneck to the raw scipy functions.
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
More information about the SciPy-User