[SciPy-User] Proposal for a new data analysis toolbox
Mon Nov 22 11:28:20 CST 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Keith Goodman <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:52 AM, <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I would like statistics (scipy.stats and statsmodels) to stick with
>>> default axis=0.
>>> I would be in favor of axis=None for nan extended versions of numpy
>>> functions and axis=0 for stats functions as defaults, but since it
>>> will be a standalone package with wider usage, I will be able to keep
>>> track of axis=-1.
>> Please let's keep everything using the same default -- it doesn't
>> actually make life simpler if for every function I have to squint and
>> try to remember whether or not it's a "stats function". (Like, what's
>> I think the world already has a sufficient supply of arbitrarily
>> inconsistent scientific APIs.
> nanstd, nanmean, etc use axis=None for the default.
Great -- I understood Josef as arguing that they shouldn't.
> axis=None mean for a moving window sum?
Well, the same as mov_sum(arr.ravel()), I suppose. Probably not very
useful for multidimensional arrays, but I'm not sure there's a better
More information about the SciPy-User