[SciPy-User] Bottleneck

Keith Goodman kwgoodman@gmail....
Tue Nov 30 18:13:00 CST 2010


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Fabrice Silva <silva@lma.cnrs-mrs.fr> wrote:
> Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 11:50 -0800, Keith Goodman a écrit :
>> The naming saga [1] continues:
>>
>> Nanny --> STAT --> DSNA --> Bottleneck
>> Some benchmarks:
>>
>> >>> bn.benchit(verbose=False)
>> Bottleneck performance benchmark
>>     Bottleneck  0.1.0dev
>>     Numpy       1.5.1
>>     Scipy       0.8.0
>
> I wanted to test bottleneck on a *really* slow machine (DELL C610,
> 866MHz, 256Mb RAM) running on Debian unstable but numpy and scipy
> versions are not the newest (Numpy 1.4.1 and Scipy 0.7.2) and prevents
> using scipy.nanstd as you are using it, see logs.
> Benchmark even fails due to error raising in this function.

That's a great test!

Could it be that older version of scipy.stats.nanstd can't handle
negative axes? In case that's the problem I added ndim to negative
axes before passing to scipy.stats.nanstd in the latest commit. Care
to try it?


More information about the SciPy-User mailing list