[SciPy-User] Pylab - standard packages

Thomas Kluyver takowl@gmail....
Sun Sep 23 14:34:29 CDT 2012


On 23 September 2012 20:17, Andreas Hilboll <lists@hilboll.de> wrote:
> I'm in favor of including both pytables and h5py. Otherwise, there will
> be people disappointed by pylab because a script given to them by
> someone else doesn't work.

This argument can be used for any package, though, and I don't want to
make the specification massive. The question is, if you're writing a
script, should you be able to assume users have pytables, h5py, or
both?

With respect to the other formats: can any of the packages handle more
than one of the three? Can anyone give a sense of how widely used HDF4
and netCDF4 are, beyond specific fields?

Of course, you can install extra packages to meet specific needs, and
a specific distribution can still ship them by default. A quick survey
of existing distributions suggests that EPD and Python(x,y) have pyhdf
and netCDF4, while Anaconda has neither. It's not clear whether SAGE
and QSnake do.

Thanks,
Thomas


More information about the SciPy-User mailing list