[SciPy-User] ftol and xtol
Thu Jun 27 19:33:00 CDT 2013
I am using the latest released version of SciPy, and I agree that the
interfaces are much improved. The termination conditions for the
optimizers is an area where the interfaces are still far from uniform. To
allow termination conditions to be specified in a uniform fashion without
breaking backwards compatibility, one would probably have to support two
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers-3 [via Scipy-User] <
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:52 PM, pfeldman <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=18466&i=0>
> > wrote:
>> I believe that making the optimization interfaces more uniform would be a
>> substantial improvement, and I'm somewhat disappointed that there has been
>> no discussion on this topic.
> Scipy 0.11 made a major step in unifying the interfaces:
> That was extensively discussed. More (backwards-compatible) improvements
> in this direction are of course very welcome.
> SciPy-User mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=18466&i=1>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> To unsubscribe from ftol and xtol, click here<http://scipy-user.10969.n7.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=18355&code=UGhpbGxpcC5NLkZlbGRtYW5AZ21haWwuY29tfDE4MzU1fC0zOTE4NzA0MQ==>
View this message in context: http://scipy-user.10969.n7.nabble.com/ftol-and-xtol-tp18355p18476.html
Sent from the Scipy-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-User