[IPython-dev] [Nipy-devel] git workflow and gitwash and what's next

Ariel Rokem arokem@berkeley....
Mon Nov 1 16:22:25 CDT 2010

Hi everyone,

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
> Any interest in trying to harmonize / summarize recent git workflow
> discussions in gitwash?  Or is it time to diverge in our gitwash
> versions?
> To summarize, I think everyone agrees with:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/2010-October/006746.html
> More controversial is Fernando's 'always rebase' proposal:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/2010-October/006748.html
> Then, Pauli extended and adapted the numpy gitwash workflow docs,
> partly as a result of the conversation on the numpy mailing list:
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/dev/gitwash/development_workflow.html
This is very good! I sometimes wish there was a 'git undo' command, so I
particularly like this section:


My recent experiences with rebasing have been quite painful and I wish I
always had a tmp branch to reset to, before I get myself into trouble.
People like me should not be allowed to follow Fernando's instructions about
rebasing, without having a tmp branch to go to, when they (that is, I) screw

> I wonder whether it's worth a little pause for discussing where we all
> agree and differ in order for us all to benefit from the recent
> improvements by Fernando (mail) Pauli (edits)?  It may also make it
> clearer whether there is still room to share a common set of gitwash
> docs, or whether it's time to diverge.
> Is there enough fundamental agreement on workflow?  My feeling is that
> there is.
I agree with you that there is  agreement :-)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20101101/5c85daa1/attachment.html 

More information about the IPython-dev mailing list