Bradley M. Froehle
Thu Aug 30 17:09:53 CDT 2012
I'm in favor of deferring the event loop issue to 0.14.
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, MinRK wrote:
> I think it's coming up on time to cut 0.13.1.
> There are two open issues currently tagged for backport:
> #2227 (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/2227) - Print name (also download as... filename) have become uninformative
> #2080 (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/2080) - Qt eventloop issues.
> Both have proposed bugfixes in #2365 (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/2365) and #2294 (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/2294) respectively. I am a bit sqeamish about the eventloop stuff, since I don't understand it.
> The script I have been using to backport tagged PRs is up (https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/2358). It's not automatic - it doesn't search for tags or push, it just does checkout and apply of requested PRs by number.
> I don't know of any other important bugs that want an 0.13.1 backport.
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPythonfirstname.lastname@example.org (mailto:IPythonemail@example.com)
More information about the IPython-dev