[IPython-user] [IPython-dev] Development plans update
Ville M. Vainio
Fri Feb 1 16:00:31 CST 2008
On Feb 1, 2008 11:38 PM, Brian Granger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I think to say that with ipython1 "it is a priority to retain API
> compatibility with the trunk" is a misinterpretation of Fernando's
> earlier statement. Many things in the ipython trunk API are by
> definition impossible to carry over the ipython1 because the
> assumptions and abstractions are so different. Of course, where we
> can we will try to maintain API compatibility, but I think those cases
> will be few and far between.
Why are they so different?
trunk/ is like the core, and a frontend will just manage the read /
If we just change all the printing to be some "write" function that
can dump stuff to frontend, and raw_input to get stuff from front end,
what else is different?
Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com
blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio'
More information about the IPython-user