[IPython-User] Slides from my IPython Scipy India 2010 talk
Tue Dec 14 11:49:18 CST 2010
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Francesc Alted <email@example.com> wrote:
> Yes, I suppose so :-) Frankly, I never realised that an interactive
> console would have so many things in common with a parallel core, but
> apparently it does.
> At any rate, my impression continues to be that a split would benefit
> the community. Those more interested in the interactive work would
> choose traditional IPython (+interfaces for toolkits like GTK or Qt),
> while others may want to take just the parallel code.
I think *for now*, when we are just finally bringing to reality this
integration, it makes complete sense to keep them together, so that
the whole set of apis can evolve in a coordinated fashion, adapting
the various pieces as needed without being bound by api boundaries;
it's too early for that.
In the future, once things have existed in this way for a while and
are more stable, we can obviously revisit the question and if it
naturally makes sense, we'll follow it :)
> Anyway, if such a split is really interesting then I suppose that it
> will eventually happen (in a similar way that the NumPy crew are working
> on splitting parts of the library that can be used by other apps).
> Thanks for the detailed explanation!
Thanks for the good questions :)
More information about the IPython-User