[IPython-User] SAGE notebook vs iPython notebook
Fri Jan 6 12:25:52 CST 2012
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Fernando Perez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Thomas Kluyver <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Why are we recreating a notebook, when SAGE's already works? I expect
> > people will weigh in with different motivations, but first off, it works
> > without a 400MB download ;-). SAGE is kind of an ecosystem of its own,
> > bundling a lot of libraries into its package system. That has various
> > consequences:
> > - Linux distributions won't package SAGE, whereas soon you'll be able to
> > "apt-get install ipython notebook"
> > - To run SAGE on Windows, you set up a virtual machine to run Linux.
> > can run natively.
> > - SAGE ships its own copy of Python (by the looks of it, that's currently
> > version 2.6.4). IPython can be installed on other versions, including
> > 3.
> All very valid and correct points, I'll provide some extra perspective
> in a separate reply.
> Yes, I agrees. On last item, I was surprised that I can't change Python
version and compiler options inside SAGE configurations without breaking
> > None of the above is criticising SAGE - the project has its own goals,
> > what they're doing makes sense for that. But for IPython, it's important
> > fit into the general Python landscape. Although we are in touch with
> > and hopefully there's room to collaborate and share code.
> With the caveat Aaron mentioned, that sage being GPL, we must ask them
> for explicit permission if we want to reuse any of their code (and
> when we've done so, they've graciously agreed to relicense snippets as
> BSD). In contrast, sage can freely use code from ipython, which it
> > I don't think inline Cython support is on the roadmap at present - it
> > like the sort of thing that would make for a good extension. If you're
> > interested in writing one, have a look here:
> > http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/config/extensions/index.html
> Actually I have a very concrete plan on how to enable sage-style
> 'cell-level magics'. The only problem is that the entire draft is in
> my brain only and I haven't had the time to sit down and type it out.
> The priority for this is obviously going up, so I'll do my best to
> flush it soon.
> Sounds encouraging.
Thank you for comprehensive replies, gents.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IPython-User