[Numpy-discussion] Counting array elements

Peter Verveer verveer at embl-heidelberg.de
Mon Oct 25 09:47:01 CDT 2004

On 25 Oct 2004, at 18:34, Stephen Walton wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 09:19 -0700, Stephen Walton wrote:
>> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 10:26 +0200, Peter Verveer wrote:
>>> I think this may be inefficient, because ravel and flat may make a 
>>> copy
>>> of the data. Also I think using flat/ravel in such a way is plain 
>>> ugly
>>> and a complex way to do it.
>> You may be right about the copying, I couldn't say.
> I just looked at the source (numeric-1.1/Lib/generic.py).  The comment
> to the ravel() function states that it returns a view, not a copy;  but
> it calls reshape() which does make a copy if the input array is not
> contiguous.  I just tested this:
> A=arange(25,shape=(5,5))
> A.transpose()		# now A is not contiguous
> v=ravel(A)
> A[2,2]=-17
> v			# verifies that v did not change.
> So, in the above, it does look like ravel() made a copy, and your fears
> about inefficiency are warranted.  Another test shows that changing
> ravel(A) to A.flat above also results in a copy.  Mayhaps we need
> sumall() after all.

Yes, we do I guess, but I do not like such things creeping into an 
otherwise elegant package if I may be frank...


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list