[Numpy-discussion] first impressions with numpy
oliphant at ee.byu.edu
Mon Apr 3 15:59:06 CDT 2006
Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Tim Hochberg wrote:
>> This would work fine if repr were instead:
>> dtype([('x', float64), ('z', complex128)])
>> Anyway, this all seems reasonable to me at first glance. That said, I
>> don't plan to work on this, I've got other fish to fry at the moment.
> A new point: Please remind me (and probably others): when did it get
> decided to introduce 'complex128' to mean numarray's complex64
> and the 'complex64' to mean numarray's complex32 ?
It was last February (i.e. 2005) when I first started posting regarding
the new NumPy. I claimed it was more consistent to use actual
bit-widths. A few people, including Perry, indicated they weren't
opposed to the change and so I went ahead with it.
You can read relevant posts by searching on
numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
Discussions are always welcome. I suppose it's not too late to change
something like this --- but it's getting there...
More information about the Numpy-discussion