[Numpy-discussion] possible bug with numpy.object_
Christopher Barker
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Thu Aug 31 11:46:06 CDT 2006
Fernando Perez wrote:
> In [8]: N.array(3).shape
> Out[8]: ()
> In [11]: N.array([]).shape
> Out[11]: (0,)
> I guess my only remaining question is: what is the difference between
> outputs #8 and #11 above? Is an empty shape tuple == array scalar,
> while a (0,) shape indicates a one-dimensional array with no elements?
> If this interpretation is correct, what is the usage of the latter
> kind of object, given how it can't even be indexed?
It can be iterated over (with zero iterations):
>>> a = N.array([])
>>> for i in a:
... print i
...
whereas the scalar can not:
>>> b = N.array(3)
>>> b
array(3)
>>> for i in b:
... print i
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: iteration over a scalar (0-dim array)
Of course the scalar isn't empty, so ti's different in that way too. Can
there be an empty scalar? It doesn't look like it. In fact, this looks
like it may be a bug:
>>> a = N.array([1,2,3]).sum(); a.shape; a.size; a
()
1
6
That's what I'd expect, but what if you start with a (0,) array:
>>> a = N.array([]).sum(); a.shape; a.size; a
()
1
0
where did that zero come from?
>>> N.__version__
'1.0b4'
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list