[Numpy-discussion] missing array type

David M. Cooke cookedm at physics.mcmaster.ca
Tue Feb 28 15:30:05 CST 2006

Tim Hochberg <tim.hochberg at cox.net> writes:
> I don't think using xrange as a template for naming anything is a good
> idea. If xrange were being added to Python now, it would almost
> certainly be called irange and live in itertools. I have a strong
> suspicion that the *name* xrange will go the way of the dodo
> eventually, although the functionality will survive in some other
> form.

In Python 3.0 it'll be named "range" :-)

|David M. Cooke                      http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/
|cookedm at physics.mcmaster.ca

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list