[Numpy-discussion] Numpy x Matlab: some synthetic benchmarks
Bruce Southey
bsouthey at gmail.com
Wed Jan 18 05:57:03 CST 2006
Hi,
Thanks for doing this as it helps determine which approach to take when
coding problems. Could you add the Numeric and numarray to these
benchmarks? If for no other reason to show the advantage of the new numpy.
I am curious in your code because you get very different results for matrix
class depending on whether x or y is transposed. Do you first transpose the
x or y first before the multiplication or is the multiplication done in
place by just switching the indices?
Also, for x'*y, is the results for Dimension 50 and Dimension 500 switched?
Thanks
Bruce
On 1/18/06, Paulo Jose da Silva e Silva <pjssilva at ime.usp.br> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Travis asked me to benchmark numpy versus matlab in some basic linear
> algebra operations. Here are the resuts for matrices/vectors of
> dimensions 5, 50 and 500:
>
> Operation x'*y x*y' A*x A*B A'*x Half 2in2
>
> Dimension 5
> Array 0.94 0.7 0.22 0.28 1.12 0.98 1.1
> Matrix 7.06 1.57 0.66 0.79 1.6 3.11 4.56
> Matlab 1.88 0.44 0.41 0.35 0.37 1.2 0.98
>
> Dimension 50
> Array 9.74 3.09 0.56 18.12 13.93 4.2 4.33
> Matrix 81.99 3.81 1.04 19.13 14.58 6.3 7.88
> Matlab 16.98 1.94 1.07 17.86 0.73 1.57 1.77
>
> Dimension 500
> Array 1.2 8.97 2.03 166.59 20.34 3.99 4.31
> Matrix 17.95 9.09 2.07 166.62 20.67 4.11 4.45
> Matlab 2.09 6.07 2.17 169.45 2.1 2.56 3.06
>
> Obs: The operation Half is actually A*x using only the lower half of the
> matrix and vector. The operation 2in2 is A*x using only the even
> indexes.
>
> Of course there are many repetitions of the same operation: 100000 for
> dim 5 and 50 and 1000 for dim 500. The inner product is number of
> repetitions is multiplied by dimension (it is very fast).
>
> The software is
>
> numpy svn version 1926
> Matlab 6.5.0.180913a Release 13 (Jun 18 2002)
>
> Both softwares are using the *same* BLAS and LAPACK (ATLAS for sse).
>
> As you can see, numpy array looks very competitive. The matrix class in
> numpy has too much overhead for small dimension though. This overhead is
> very small for medium size arrays. Looking at the results above
> (specially the small dimensions ones, for higher dimensions the main
> computations are being performed by the same BLAS) I believe we can say:
>
> 1) Numpy array is faster on usual operations but outerproduct (I believe
> the reason is that the dot function uses the regular matrix
> multiplication to compute outer-products, instead of using a special
> function. This can "easily" changes). In particular numpy was faster in
> matrix times vector operations, which is the most usual in numerical
> linear algebra.
>
> 2) Any operation that involves transpose suffers a very big penalty in
> numpy. Compare A'*x and A*x, it is 10 times slower. In contrast Matlab
> deals with transpose quite well. Travis is already aware of this and it
> can be probably solved.
>
> 3) When using subarrays, numpy is a slower. The difference seems
> acceptable. Travis, can this be improved?
>
> Best,
>
> Paulo
>
> Obs: Latter on (in a couple of days) I may present less synthetic
> benchmarks (a QR factorization and a Modified Cholesky).
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060118/4066dba9/attachment.html
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list