[Numpy-discussion] .M .A .T .H attribute result

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sat Jul 8 14:57:41 CDT 2006

Hi all,

On 7/8/06, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> On 7/7/06, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't compile the results, but the discussion on the idea of adding
> > new attributes to the array object led to the following result.
> >
> > Added:  .T attribute to mean self.transpose()
> [...]
> > .H
> >
> > A few were in favor, but this can now be written .T.conj()  which is not
> > bad so does not get a new attribute.
> I didn't have strong feelings one way or another on this, so I didn't
> vote, but at this point I'd like to make a comment before the freeze.
> Given that .T went in, I'd argue that .H should be in as well.
> Basically, I now think these two should have been considered as a
> bundle and not as separate options.

+1. H is just the complex counterpart of T.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060708/57cb9d0a/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list