[Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

Christopher Barker Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Mon Jul 10 13:30:59 CDT 2006

Ed Schofield wrote:
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as  
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?


+1 for ONLY allowing tuples.

Or just get rid of it.


Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list