[Numpy-discussion] numpy vs numeric benchmarks
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Fri Jun 2 12:08:32 CDT 2006
Joris De Ridder wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 14:58, Eric Jonas wrote:
> [EJ]: Hello! I've been using numeric for a while, and the recent list traffic
> [EJ]: prompted me to finally migrate all my old code. On a whim, we were
> [EJ]: benchmarking numpy vs numeric and have been lead to the conclusion that
> [EJ]: numpy is at least 50x slower; a 1000x1000 matmul takes 16 sec in numpy
> [EJ]: but 300 ms in numeric.
> You mean the other way around?
> I also tested numpy vs numarray, and numarray seems to be roughly 3 times
> faster than numpy for your particular testcase.
Please post your test cases. We are trying to remove any slowness, but
need testers to do it.
More information about the Numpy-discussion