[Numpy-discussion] logical_and operator, &&, is missing?

Alan G Isaac aisaac at american.edu
Sat Jun 24 19:38:39 CDT 2006

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Eric Firing apparently wrote: 
> I suspect that many other people will trip over the lack 
> of && in the same way that I have, and will similarly 
> consider it an irritant that we work around because we 
> have to, not because it is good. 

I agree with this.

In addition, turning to & when && is wanted
will likely cause occasional stumbles over operator 
precedence.  (At least I've been bitten that way.)

But I do not see this changing unless Python grants
the ability to define new operators, in which case
I'm sure the wish lists will come out ...

Alan Isaac

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list