A reimplementation of MaskedArray

Michael Sorich michael.sorich at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 19:19:27 CDT 2006

On 10/17/06, Pierre GM <pgmdevlist at mailcan.com> wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 22:08, Michael Sorich wrote:
> > Does this new MA class allow masking of rearray like arrays?
> Excellent question! Which is to say, I have no idea... I don't use
> recordarray, so I didn't think about testing them.
> So, a first test indicates that it doesn't work either. The mask for a3 is
> understood as having a size 6, when the data is seen as size 2 only (exactly
> the same problem as the original ma module).
> I gonna poke around and check whether I can come with a workaround. Just to
> make it clear: you want to be able to mask some fields in some records,
> right ? Not mask all the fields of a record ?

Yes, that is correct. It would be preferable to have more control over
masking than simply masking an entire record. I view the heterogenouse
arrays as 2D arrays in which it should be possible to mask individual

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list