[SciPy-user] Need more comments from scientific community on python-dev

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Tue Oct 31 11:55:51 CST 2006

On 10/31/06, John Hunter <jdhunter at ace.bsd.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> >>>>> "Travis" == Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> writes:
>     Travis> All of these seem to define their own objects which are
>     Travis> basically just interpretations of chunks of memory.  At
>     Travis> one time, we might have said "these should all be
>     Travis> sub-classes of the ndarray".  Now, we are thinking more
> What about blitting pixel buffers from mpl or chaco agg into various
> GUI windows, GTK, Tk, WX, etc....  This seems like a ready made case
> for the array interface.  I could pipe in with an example like this if
> it would help.

I would also like to see the socket object take a more general type than
python strings. I suspect there are a lot of such things in python --
interfaces to services and such -- that would benefit from using a more
general interface to memory blocks. But I am not a python developer and
don't really know how to make that case.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20061031/9cc7047e/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
-------------- next part --------------
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list