[Numpy-discussion] Detect subclass of ndarray
Charles R Harris
Sat Mar 24 15:29:35 CDT 2007
On 3/24/07, Travis Oliphant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Alan G Isaac wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Travis Oliphant apparently wrote:
> >> My opinion is that a 1-d array in matrix-multiplication
> >> should always be interpreted as a row vector. Is this not
> >> what is currently done? If not, then it is a bug in my
> >> mind.
> >>>> N.__version__
> > '1.0'
> >>>> I
> > matrix([[ 1., 0.],
> > [ 0., 1.]])
> >>>> I*N.ones(2)
> > matrix([[ 1., 1.]])
> > If N.ones(2) were treated as a row vector,
> > matrix multiplication is not possible.
> > So the question is what should happen.
> > I would like an exception raised.
> > The current behavior is lmost certainly not desirable,
> > although it has the virute of matching ``dot``.
> I think that's why it is the current behavior --- by default rather than
> by design. But, dot has different use cases.
> I'd be fine with an error raised on matrix multiplication (as long as
> dot is not changed). In other words, I'd like to see 1-d arrays always
> interpreted the same way (as row vectors) when used in matrix
Sounds good to me, it keeps things simple. The behavious 1-D -> row vector
when promoted to a matrix should be documented as official behaviour. I
filed ticket #473 on this yesterday.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion