[Numpy-discussion] Anyone have a well-tested SWIG-based C++ STL valarray <=> numpy.array typemap to share?
Thu Sep 20 04:46:46 CDT 2007
Charles R Harris wrote:
> Templates are a godsend for containers and such using multiple types.
> I think that much of Numpy could be naturally written up that way.
Using template makes wrapping the API by another language almost
impossible. This alone is a pretty good argument against using C++ at
all (this is actually one of the reason I stopped using it for most of
my projects). The numpy approach is in my opinion much better: provides
a good and complete C API. You can always put a C++ api on top of it,
which is much easier than the contrary (putting a C api around a C++ API).
> I found the performance of ublas to be pretty good for small arrays
> when it was compiled with the -NODEBUG option, the assembly code
> looked pretty good too. The default with all the bounds checking and
> such is terrible and the assembly code practically unreadable (180
> character function identifiers, etc), but for debugging it did its job.
I am sure I tested with the -NODEBUG, because I remembered having looked
for an array container which does bound checking using a compilation
option. It is quit likely that the library was much improved since I
looked the last time.
More information about the Numpy-discussion