[Numpy-discussion] numpyx.pyx (recent svn) works?
Travis E. Oliphant
Tue Apr 8 18:38:09 CDT 2008
Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Robert Kern wrote:
>> > I'm not sure how it could. It's example code, not part of numpy itself.
>> OK, maybe I should keep my 2 cents. They appear to be forged money, and
>> worth nothing.
> I *could* make it pyrex/cython-valid, it's trivial but just adds noise
> IMHO... As Stefan said, pyrex is essentially unmaintained as far as
> publicly-visible development goes, while cython is very actively
> moving ahead and likely picking up better numpy support soon (thanks
> to Dag and other GSoC work), so why not just follow that?
I say just add it. We should move forward with Cython. More important
is to see if random actually builds with Cython right now. There was an
issue that I recall from a few weeks ago that Cython could not build the
pyrex extension in NumPy.
More information about the Numpy-discussion