[Numpy-discussion] Toward a numpy build with warning: handling unused variable

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Tue Aug 5 07:49:46 CDT 2008

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:28 AM, David Cournapeau <cournape@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > David, I second your approach. Furthermore, look how SWIG handles
> > this, it is very similar to your proposal. The difference is that SWIG
> > uses SWIGUNUSED for some autogenerated functions. Furthermore, it
> > seems the SWIG developers protected the generated code taking into
> > account GCC versions ;-) and the C++ case, and also Intel compilers.
> Yes, I would have been surprised if most compilers do not have a way
> to deal with that. I did not know icc handled __attribute__.
> Charles, are you still have strongly against this, since this is in
> the vein of what you suggested (tagging the argument) ?

I think tagging the argument is the way to go.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080805/6c76af7a/attachment.html 

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list