[Numpy-discussion] unique1d returning indices

Robert Cimrman cimrman3@ntc.zcu...
Mon Aug 11 10:40:14 CDT 2008

Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> 2008/8/11 Robert Cimrman <cimrman3@ntc.zcu.cz>:
>>>> Note also that the order of outputs has changed (previously unique1d()
>>>> returned (i, b) for return_index=True).
>>> Does this not constitute an API change?
>> It does. Are there many users of unique1d( a, return_index=True ) out there?
>> The new way is consistent with matlab, and IMHO more logical - the
>> additional return values are appended to the returned tuple rather than
>> prepended. It was my mistake to introduce the previous order (do not
>> recall the motivation anymore :]).
> The new way is definitely more consistent -- I think one could almost
> call its current behaviour a bug.  Unless there are objections, let's
> follow the standard route: put a deprecation warning in place for one
> release and remove it in the next.

Yeah, that's why I think not many people used the extra return anyway.
I will do as you say unless somebody steps in.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list