[Numpy-discussion] Generalized ufuncs?

Travis E. Oliphant oliphant@enthought....
Fri Aug 15 01:35:37 CDT 2008

Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
>> Can we fix the ticket notification mailings some day? It's been almost 
>> four months now.
> That would be fabulous.  So far nobody has figured out how... Jarrod??
>> Re: the patch. I noticed the replacement of the signed type int by an 
>> unsigned size_t.
> Where did you notice this?   I didn't see it.
Are you referring to Stefan's patch to the Fu's _parse_signature code in 
r5654.    This is a local function, I'm not sure why there is a concern.

>> python or numpy types. The use of inline and the local declaration of 
>> variables would also have been caught early in a code review.
> What do you mean by the local declaration of variables?
Never mind,  I understand it's the mid-code declaration of variables 
(without a separate block defined) that Stefan fixed.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list