[Numpy-discussion] Generalized ufuncs?

Andrew Dalke dalke@dalkescientific....
Fri Aug 15 02:18:52 CDT 2008

Andrew Dalke:
> For reference, a page on using inline and doing so portably:
>   http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2003/03/inline.html

On Aug 15, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Doesn't do the trick for compilers that aren't C99 compliant. And  
> there are many of them. For gcc there are other options.

Pardon?  It seems to list several ways to handle compilers that don't  
implement C99.  Mostly by having a single INLINE define in one form  
or another to trigger the correct support.

For example:

      You can support legacy compilers (i.e. anything without "inline")
      via -Dinline="", although this wastes space.

The gcc options like -finline-functions and -finline-functions-called- 
once don't affect the grammar and don't seem relevant here.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list