[Numpy-discussion] Possible new multiplication operators for Python

Gael Varoquaux gael.varoquaux@normalesup....
Tue Aug 19 12:06:45 CDT 2008

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:57:45AM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> But we apparently agree that PEP 225 meets the need for
> a multiplication operator (with either ~ or @).  Do you
> agree with Robert that *only* the multiplication operator is
> needed? (See my previous post.)

No big opinion on that.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list