[Numpy-discussion] bug in ma.masked_all()?

Pierre GM pgmdevlist@gmail....
Tue Dec 2 11:57:06 CST 2008

On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Eric Firing wrote:

> Pierre,
> Your change fixed masked_all for the example I gave, but I think it  
> introduced a new failure in zeros:

Would you mind giving r6131 a try ? It's rather ugly but looks like it  

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list