[Numpy-discussion] problem with NumPy test harness in 1.1.0?
Tue Jul 1 18:53:58 CDT 2008
Thanks for the input Fernando.
On Jul 1, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Robert Kern <email@example.com>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 18:39, David Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> OK, thanks for the info Robert.
>>> Any recommendations for another test harness?
>> numpy and scipy are moving to nose as of numpy 1.2 and scipy 0.7.
>> It has been a personal favorite of mine for some time, too.
> So has ipython recently, for what it's worth. It does make easy a lot
> of things that should be easy but aren't under unittest, which is a
> big plus in my view. We also adopted it after advice from Robert,
> others at Enthought and Titus Brown during a BOF session at last
> year's SciPy.
> The fact that nose absorbs/recognizes all regular unittest tests makes
> the transition fairly easy.
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
More information about the Numpy-discussion