[Numpy-discussion] Reference guide updated

Neil Crighton neilcrighton@gmail....
Wed Jul 23 17:16:57 CDT 2008

Ok, thanks.

I meant the amount of vertical space between lines of text - for
example, the gaps between parameter values and their description, or
the large spacing between both lines of text and and the text boxes in
the examples section. If other people agree it's a problem, I thought
the spacing could be tweaked.  It's not a problem that there's more
than one function per page.

I have been helping out with the docs (where I feel I'm qualified
enough - I'm no numpy expert!).  I think it will make numpy much
easier to learn to have easily-accessible, comprehensive docstrings,
and the documentation editor makes it very easy to contribute.  I'm
also learning a lot reading other people's docstrings :)

> > It there a reason why there's so much vertical space between all of the
> > text sections?  I find the docstrings much easier to read in the editor:
> Roughly:
> * In the editor, you have one function per page, vs several function per page
> in the reference
> * in the editor, the blocks 'Parameters', 'Returns'... are considered as
> sections, while in the reference, they are Field lists (roughly).
> In the end, it's only a matter of taste, of course. But you raise an
> interesting point, we should provide some kind of options to choose between
> behaviors.
> Please note as well that the reference guide is a work in progress: you're
> more than welcome to join and work with us.

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list