[Numpy-discussion] missing function in numpy.ma?

Jarrod Millman millman@berkeley....
Thu Mar 27 19:23:02 CDT 2008

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Travis E. Oliphant
<oliphant@enthought.com> wrote:
>  If this works then it should be fine.  If it doesn't, however, then it
>  would not be too big a deal to just move the old implementation over.
>  In fact, I rather think it ought to be done anyway.

My main concern is that we shouldn't release 1.0.5 with known missing
functionality in the new implementation of MaskedArrays.

More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list