[Numpy-discussion] New ufuncs

Stéfan van der Walt stefan@sun.ac...
Wed Nov 5 15:41:37 CST 2008

2008/11/5 T J <tjhnson@gmail.com>:
> numpy, it seems that logadd or logaddexp is probably a more fitting
> name.  So long as it is documented, I doubt it matters much though...

Please don't call it logadd.  `logaddexp` or `logsumexp` are both
fine, but the `exp` part is essential in emphasising that you are not
calculating a+b using logs.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list