[Numpy-discussion] Questions on error handling/refcounting in some ufunc object loops.
Charles R Harris
Fri Nov 14 00:39:47 CST 2008
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM, David Cournapeau <
> Charles R Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:50 PM, David Cournapeau
> > <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>
> > wrote:
> > Robert Kern wrote:
> > >
> > > There are ufunc loop implementations outside of numpy. It would
> > break
> > > the API, specifically the typedef PyUFuncGenericFunction.
> > >
> > Would something like a ufunc-specific errno be acceptable in that
> > case ?
> > That might get tricky with threading in the mix.
> The trick is at configuration, to know how to "tag" a variable for TLS.
> Windows can do it, posix has it (errno is thread-specific in recent
> posix). I don't know of any other solution, since returning error code
> is not possible, but maybe there is ?
BTW, David, would you mind if I moved the rest of the function definitions
into math_c99? I would like to separate the loops from the functions. It
might also be nice to have a template somewhere to combine all the code
pieces. Having includes scattered here and there through the code is a bit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion