[Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes
Tue Nov 25 14:33:29 CST 2008
Pierre GM wrote:
> Nope, we still need to double check whether there's any missing data
> in any field of the line we process, independently of the conversion.
> So there must be some extra loop involved, and I'd need a special
> function in numpy.ma to take care of that. So our options are
> * create a new function in numpy.ma and leave np.loadtxt like that
> * write a new np.loadtxt incorporating most of the ideas of the code I
> send, but I'd still need to adapt it to support masked values.
You couldn't run this loop on the array returned by np.loadtxt() (by
masking on the appropriate fill value)?
>> I'll post that when I'm done and we can see if it looks like too much
>> functionality stapled together or not.
> Sounds like a plan. Wouldn't mind getting more feedback from fellow
> users before we get too deep, however...
Graduate Research Assistant
School of Meteorology
University of Oklahoma
More information about the Numpy-discussion