[Numpy-discussion] DVCS at PyCon

Ondrej Certik ondrej@certik...
Mon Apr 6 15:00:42 CDT 2009

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, David Cournapeau
<david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> I agree.  The PEP does not show overwhelming superiority (or, arguably,
>> even mild superiority) of any alternative
> I think this PEP was poorly written. You can't see any of the
> advantage/differences of the different systems. Some people even said
> they don't see the differences with svn. I think the reason partly is
> that the PEP focused on existing python workflows, but the whole point,
> at least for me, is to change the general workflow (for reviews, code
> contributions, etc...). Stephen J. Turnbull sums it up nicely:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087968.html
> FWIW, I tend to agree that Hg is less disruptive than git when coming
> from svn, at least for the simple tasks (I don't know hg enough to have
> a really informed opinion for more advanced workflows).

Yes, git rocks.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list