[Numpy-discussion] Three bugs fixed
Charles R Harris
Thu Dec 3 16:20:43 CST 2009
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Travis Oliphant <email@example.com>wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Travis Oliphant <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
>> Thanks to the reporters of tickets #1108, #1197 (similar to #1279), and
>> Pointing out these problems allowed me to find and squash two subtle
>> memory leaks and one just plain stupid bug lurking in reduce-at (when using
>> the buffered internal loop).
>> I think I fixed the problems. I added a test for #1108, but I don't have
>> good tests for the memory leak fixes. I'm not sure how to write a good
>> test for those.
>> Even though it may take several months to get to the tickets with my
>> limited time, please do continue to report problems. I'm hoping to have
>> more time for NumPy next year.
> Good job! Nice to have the reduceat bug tracked down. Now for some nits ;)
> Thanks for keeping the code clean.
> O.K. I can commit to the trunk first.
> How do I see what the build-bot machines are giving errors on. I'd like to
> try and fix the bus errors if possible while I'm thinking about it?
I like the waterfall view
http://buildbot.scipy.org/waterfall?show_events=false, it doesn't
automatically update though, so you need to refresh it now and then. The
root page is at http://buildbot.scipy.org/. Mind, the SPARC machines take
10-15 minutes to complete on a good day. If you hit the stdio link on the
waterfall display for a machine you can view the test output.
I expect the bus error is from the starting index fix.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion