[Numpy-discussion] suggestion for generalizing numpy functions

Darren Dale dsdale24@gmail....
Sat Jul 25 19:33:58 CDT 2009

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Darren Dale<dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Darren Dale<dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Darren Dale<dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/7/20 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za>:
>>>> Hi Chuck
>>>> 2009/7/17 Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com>:
>>>>> PyObject* PyTuple_GetItem(PyObject *p, Py_ssize_t pos)
>>>>> Return value: Borrowed reference.
>>>>> Return the object at position pos in the tuple pointed to by p. If pos is
>>>>> out of bounds, return NULL and sets an IndexError exception. It's a borrowed
>>>>> reference so you need to call Py_INCREF on it. I find this Python C-API
>>>>> documentation useful.
>>>> Have you had a look over the rest of the code?  I think this would
>>>> make a good addition.  Travis mentioned Contexts for doing something
>>>> similar, but I don't know enough about that concept to compare the
>>>> two.
>>> I think contexts would be very different from what is already in
>>> place. For now, it would be nice to make this one small improvement to
>>> the existing ufunc infrastructure, and maybe consider contexts (which
>>> I still don't understand) at a later time. I have improved the code
>>> slightly and added a few tests, and will post a new patch later this
>>> morning. I just need to add some documentation.
>> Here is a better patch, which includes a few additional tests and adds
>> some documentation. It also attempts to improve the docstring and
>> sphinx docs for __array_wrap__, which may have been a little bit
>> misleading. There is also some whitespace cleanup in a few places.
>> Would someone please review my work and commit the patch if it is
>> acceptable? Pierre or Travis, would either of you have a chance to
>> look over the implementation and the documentation changes, since you
>> two seem to be most familiar with ufuncs and subclassing ndarray?
> It looks like part of my patch has been clobbered by changes
> introduced in svn 7184-7191. What else should I be doing so a patch
> like this can be committed relatively quickly?

Could I please obtain commit privileges so I can commit this feature
to svn myself?


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list