[Numpy-discussion] Reminder: code freeze for bet at the end of the WE

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Sat Mar 14 15:28:01 CDT 2009

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla@molden.no> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
>> note
>> to repeat testing if the test fails.
> I don't like this. I think the prngs should use fixed seeds known to pass
> the test. Depending on confidence intervals in the units tests is really,
> really bad style. Tests should be deterministic.
> S.M.

The hypergeometric tests are on the support of the distribution and
should never fail. And the outcome is not random.

 The test of logser with N = 100000 also should be pretty exact and
fail only with very low probability in the patched version. But again
this is testet in scipy.stats.

I think Sturlas idea to find a random seed that differentiates before
and after will be better for numpy, and using only a small sample size
e.g. N=1000, since it's pretty fast. But since I don't have an
unpatched numpy version available right now, I cannot do this.


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list