[Numpy-discussion] documenting index_tricks
josef.pktd@gmai...
josef.pktd@gmai...
Sun May 24 14:22:37 CDT 2009
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm documenting the index_tricks module and am unsure how to handle r_ and
> related objects. r_ is an instance of RClass, therefore ipython shows the
> RClass docstring for "r_?". RClass in the doc editor is also marked as
> "needs editing", and the page for r_ is completely empty (see
> http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.r_/#numpy-r). It seems like only one
> of the two should be edited and then the docstring should be copied over.
it looks like this is already the case, the htmlhelp and the sphinx
generated docs
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.r_.html#numpy.r_
show the docstring that I get with help(np.r_) for RClass on the
python prompt, even though in the doc editor it is empty.
So editing RClass seems to be the right thing to do.
Josef
>In
> Travis Oliphant's Guide to Numpy r_ is extensively documented, should I
> integrate part of that with one of the docstrings?
>
> About the code itself, is there a use case for having two RClass instances
> at the same time? If not maybe RClass should be a private class. Also a name
> like RowConcatenator (it is a subclass of AxisConcatenator) would make more
> sense. I'm not sure this change is worth the trouble though.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list