[Numpy-discussion] Solaris Sparc build broken
Tue Nov 10 17:37:35 CST 2009
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Michael Droettboom <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I don't know if your 'long double' detection code is complete yet, but I
> thought I'd share the current build output on one of our Solaris
> machines. It looks like it may just be a typo difference between
> 'IEEE_QUAD_BE' in long_double_representation() and 'IEEE_QUAD_16B_BE' in
> setup.py, but I wanted to confirm.
Yes, you're right - I don't have any machine with a 128 bits long
double type, so I let the typo slipped.
Could you try last revision (r7726) ?
More information about the NumPy-Discussion