[Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-dev] Deprecate chararray [was Plea for help]
Michael Droettboom
mdroe@stsci....
Thu Oct 1 11:26:29 CDT 2009
Thanks. There's a bit of a snag getting my SVN permissions, and the doc
editor permissions I assume are pending. Once those things are in
place, I can move forward on this and hopefully it will be clear what
needs to be done.
Mike
David Goldsmith wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Ralf Gommers
> <ralf.gommers@googlemail.com <mailto:ralf.gommers@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:37 PM, David Goldsmith
> <d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com <mailto:d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So, Ralf (or anyone), how, if at all, should we modify the
> status of the existing chararray objects/methods in the wiki?
>
>
> Nothing has to be done until *after* Mike has committed his
> changes to svn. Please see my previous email for what has to
> happen at that point. Since Mike wrote the new docstrings it would
> be best if he updated the status of the wiki pages then.
>
>
> OK; Mike: hopefully it will be clear what you have to do to update the
> status (it's pretty trivial) but of course don't hesitate to email
> (you can do so off-list if you prefer) w/ any questions;
> unfortunately, AFAIK, there's no way to update the status of many
> docstrings all at once - you'll have to do them each individually (if
> you like, let me know when you've committed them and I can help - it
> sounds like there will be a lot); the main "silly" thing to remember
> is that the option to change the "Review status" only appears if
> you're logged in. :-)
>
>
> Assuming you have no problem sharing them with me, Michael,
> I could add those docstrings you created for the existing methods,
>
>
> They will show up in the wiki when they get committed to svn
> (presumably within a few days), so this is needless effort for the
> most part. If there are different changes in the wiki and svn,
> that will show up in the "merge" page.
>
> The ony thing that requires manual effort is if there are changes
> in the wiki and the object got moved in svn.
>
>
> And, as above, updating the status in the Wiki. :-)
>
> DG
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
>
> DG
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Michael Droettboom
> <mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>> wrote:
>
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Michael Droettboom
> <mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>
> > <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>>> wrote:
> >
> > In the source in my working copy. Is that going to
> cause problems? I
> > wasn't sure if it was possible to document methods
> that didn't yet
> > exist
> > in the code in the wiki.
> >
> > That is fine. New functions will automatically show up
> in the wiki. It
> > would be helpful though if you could mark them ready for
> review in the
> > wiki (if they are) after they show up. Could take up to
> 24 hours for
> > svn changes to propagate.
> Thanks. Will do.
> >
> > Only if you moved functions around it would be useful if
> you pinged
> > Pauli after you committed them. This is a temporary
> problem, right now
> > the wiki creates a new page for a moved object, and the
> old content
> > (if any) has to be copied over to the new page.
> All of the functions that were moved were previously
> without docstrings
> in SVN, though some had docstrings (that I just now
> discovered) in the
> wiki. This may cause some hiccups, I suppose, so I'll be
> sure to
> announce when these things get committed to SVN so I know
> how to help
> straighten these things out.
>
> Mike
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ralf
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > David Goldsmith wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Michael Droettboom
> > <mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>
> <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>>
> > > <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>
> <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2) Improve documentation
> > >
> > > Every method now has a docstring, and a new
> page of routines
> > has been
> > > added to the Sphinx tree.
> > >
> > >
> > > Um, where did you do this, 'cause it's not showing
> up in the doc
> > wiki.
> > >
> > > DG
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>>
> > >
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Droettboom
> > Science Software Branch
> > Operations and Engineering Division
> > Space Telescope Science Institute
> > Operated by AURA for NASA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>>
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
>
> --
> Michael Droettboom
> Science Software Branch
> Operations and Engineering Division
> Space Telescope Science Institute
> Operated by AURA for NASA
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
--
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Operations and Engineering Division
Space Telescope Science Institute
Operated by AURA for NASA
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list