[Numpy-discussion] GSOC 2010

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Wed Oct 21 14:11:55 CDT 2009

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have.  I
> think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our part, we weren't
> ready when the students started showing up on the lists. So I would like to
> put together a selection of suitable projects and corresponding mentors that
> we could put on the wiki somewhere and advertise. Just to start things off,
> here are two things that come to mind.
> Python 3k transition. I think it is time to start looking at this seriously.
> Best of breed special functions in cython. These could be part of a separate
> numpy extras package where code is restricted to C, Cython, and Python.
> Thoughts?

for scipy: more stats, gsoc2009 went very well.


> Chuck
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list